A parent application received a notice of allowance, and the issue fee was paid; the patent issued on Tuesday, August 4, 2026. The applicant filed a continuation claiming the parent's benefit on Tuesday, August 4, 2026, before the issue date had passed. Is the continuation entitled to the parent's filing date, assuming the parent supports its claims?
Answer: Yes, because a continuation filed on the parent's issue date is still copending. 35 U.S.C. 120 requires the later application to be filed before the patenting or abandonment of the earlier one. The Office treats an application filed on the date the parent issues as copending, because the patent is not considered granted until the end of that day (MPEP 211.01(b)). Why not the others: - Before the issue fee: paying the issue fee does not end pendency; issuance does. - One day before: filing on the issue date itself is sufficient. - A withdrawal petition: not needed if the continuation is filed by the issue date. - Patented parents: benefit can be claimed to a parent that later issued, provided the later application was filed while the parent was pending. Rule: Copendency exists if the later application is filed no later than the day the parent issues or is abandoned. Source: MPEP § 211.01(b) (9th ed., Rev. 01.2024); 35 U.S.C. 120; as at Oct 2026
Thinking that paying the issue fee closes the window for continuations.
Practice more Patent bar Benefit and priority claims questions
Exam-style questions with worked answers, then full timed mocks. Free to start.
Build a daily practice habit — a few exam-style questions a day, with worked answers. Free to start.
Start practicing →Original study material written from the MPEP; not a question from the current exam.Independent. Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USPTO. Verify figures and rules against current guidance before relying on them.